FROM THE PRESS - KATU (ABC News), OREGON:
Ray Warren from Linn County, Oregon, Doubled His Pickup's Gas Mileage from 15 MPG to 30 MPG in Town:
Read full article: http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
FROM THE PRESS - WVEC-TV (ABC News), VIRGINIA:
Art Green from Norfolk, Virginia, More Than Doubled The Mileage of His Chevy
Avalanche from 20 to 40
MPG on The Highway and in Town from 8 to 20 MPG:
Watch Joe
Flanagan reporting for WVEC-TV:
http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
Read full article: www.wvec.com/news/topstories/stories/wvec_local_081808_water_for_gas_update_.db6c4e2.html
- Definition 1: What is Supplemental Hydrogen? It means that we use hydrogen as a supplemental fuel to regular fuel. We do not promote hydrogen-only (too dangerous) and we have no "drive your car on water" nonsense!!! But Supplemental Hydrogen, however, is a great idea and is simpler and cheaper than you might think. In the next few minutes you will find out how.
- Definition 2: What is Hydrogen-From-Water?
While Supplemental Hydrogen may come from a
tank of pressurized hydrogen, Hydrogen-From-Water
comes from water, and the hydrogen is being produced from FROM WATER on board the vehicle while you drive.
Therefore it is often called Hydrogen-On-Demand.
- Bottom line: Hydrogen-From-Water IS one way to have Supplemental Hydrogen, only cheaper and
safer.
|
GOOD NEWS:
Compelling Evidence found that NASA, the
U.S. Patent Office, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, and Detroit, as well as scientists from around the World, all
agree that Supplemental Hydrogen has the
potential to improve Fuel Efficiency, reduce harmful
emissions and allow leaner operation of Internal Combustion
Engines. The list below is only a partial collection
of references regarding supplemental hydrogen, from official publications
of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), DOT (United
States Department of Transportation), USPTO (United States Patent and
Trademark Office) as well as other Patent Offices, JPL (Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, California Institute of Technology) and surprisingly,
"Detroit" itself (namely, The Society of Automotive Engineers of Troy,
Michigan, USA). Obviously not all documents are saying exactly the same
thing, but the overall picture is clear - SUPPLEMENTAL HYDROGEN CAN GIVE
US:
|
1)
Department of Transportation: Guidelines For Use Of Hydrogen Fuel In Commercial Vehicles -
see page 20 - "Onboard electrolyzers are used with
hydrogen injection systems for diesel engines (see Section 3.5). In this case,
only a small amount of hydrogen and oxygen are produced to supplement, not
replace, the diesel fuel used in the engine. The electricity to operate the
electrolyzer is typically supplied by the engine?s alternator or 12/24-VDC
electrical system."
2) NASA
in their Technical Note Report E-9105
(NASA-TN-D-8487)
http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
- published May 1, 1977:
? This report is
titled "Emissions And Total Energy Consumption Of A Multicylinder Piston Engine
Running On Gasoline And A Hydrogen-Gasoline Mixture", and NASA's abstract (in
their archives today) says: "A multicylinder reciprocating engine was used
to extend the efficient lean operating range of gasoline by
adding hydrogen. Both bottled hydrogen and hydrogen produced by a
research methanol steam reformer were used. These results were compared with
results for all gasoline. A high-compression-ratio,
displacement production engine was used. Apparent flame speed was used to
describe the differences in emissions and performance. Therefore, engine
emissions and performance, including apparent flame speed and energy lost to the
cooling system and the exhaust gas, were measured over a range of equivalence
ratios for each fuel. All emission levels decreased at the leaner conditions.
Adding hydrogen significantly increased flame speed over all equivalence
ratios."
? This research focused on using hydrogen as a supplemental fuel to gasoline to a 1969
production engine. The research demonstrated that the higher flame speed of
hydrogen was responsible for being able to extend the efficient lean operating
range of a gasoline engine:
? "Lean-mixture-ratio
combustion in internal-combustion engines has the potential of producing low emissions and higher thermal efficiency for several
reasons. First, excess oxygen in the charge further oxidizes unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. Second,
excess oxygen lowers the peak combustion
temperatures, which inhibits the formation of oxides of nitrogen. Third,
the lower combustion temperatures increase the
mixture specific heat ratio by decreasing the net
dissociation losses. Fourth, as the specific heat ratio increases, the cycle thermal efficiency also increases, which gives the
potential for better fuel economy."
?
"Adding hydrogen to gasoline significantly increased flame speed and
allows for a leaner air-fuel ratio. All emissions levels decreased at these
leaner conditions. ...significantly increased flame speed and allows for a
leaner air/fuel ratio. All emissions levels decreased at these leaner
conditions."
? "The results were used to explain
the advantages of adding hydrogen to gasoline as a method
of extending the lean operating range. The minimum-energy-consumption
equivalence ratio was extended to leaner conditions by adding hydrogen, although
the minimum energy consumption did not change. All
emission levels decreased at the leaner conditions. Also, adding
hydrogen significantly increased flame speed over all equivalence
ratios."
? The official document
may be downloaded from
NASA Archives (document ID 19770016170):
http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
3) The
Society of Automotive Engineers of Troy, Michigan (="Detroit")
This
is a huge organization with over 121,000 members! The list below shows a
collection of references found in their official
publications of the past 35 years (today it is published online http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/) - from which it is obvious that
THEY HAVE KNOWN all about it [source: Google - this info appears on many
websites and I couldn't tell who's the original compiler]:
? Publication #740187, February 1974: Adding hydrogen to
gasoline resulted in significant efficiency
improvements due to the extension of the lean operating
limit.
? Publication #740600, February 1974:
<2. span class="style1">A compact onboard hydrogen generator has been
developed for use with a hydrogen-enriched gasoline internal combustion engine.
? Publication #810348, February 1981: Adding
hydrogen to gasoline showed a potential for very low
pollutant emissions with increased energy efficiency.
? Publication #830897, April 1989: Adding hydrogen to
gasoline produces improvements in engine efficiency and
emissions due to accelerated flame speed and combustion rate.
? Publication
#960603, February 1996: Adding hydrogen to gasoline produces improvements in engine efficiency and emissions, due to
accelerated combustion.
? Publication
#2000-01-2206, June 2000: Adding hydrogen to gasoline can reduce exhaust emissions and increase efficiency. A large
reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions can be achieved without a catalytic converter due to very lean operation
under certain conditions.
? Publication
#2002-01-2196, July 2002: Adding hydrogen to gasoline increases the flame
speed at all gasoline air/fuel ratios, so engine operation
at very lean mixtures is possible.
?
Publication #2003-01-0630, March 2003: Adding hydrogen to gasoline
extended the lean limit of engine operation, resulting in greater efficiency and
reduced emissions, both hydrocarbons and nitrogen
oxides.
? Publication #2003-32-0011,
September 2003: Adding hydrogen to gasoline resulted in
improved engine.
? Publication
#2004-01-0972, March 2004: Adding hydrogen to gasoline results in lower
emissions and a significant increase in engine efficiency.
? Publication #2004-01-1270, March 2004: Adding hydrogen to
gasoline produces improvements in engine efficiency and
emissions.
? Publication
#2004-01-1851, June 2004: Adding hydrogen to gasoline reduced knock due to accelerated fuel burn and shortened
combustion period.
? Publication
#2005-01-0232, April 2005: Adding hydrogen to gasoline produces lower emissions due to increased flame speed and resultant
accelerated fuel burn.
? Publication
#2005-01-0251, April 2005: Adding hydrogen to gasoline can extend the lean limits of the air/fuel
ratio.
4) Some of the many Patents
Registered in the USA, UK and Australia:
? US
patent 1,262,034 - filed 1916, approved 1918 - This is the oldest
hydrogen-on-demand patent I have found FOR VEHICLE USE - yet the American
inventor, Charles H. Frazer, writes as if the principles were nothing new back
in 1916! Note the use of the term "Hydro-Oxygen Generators" used at the
beginning of the textual part to describe the entire water-fuel industry (this
is my interpretation). He describes the purpose of the device to be: ?In this manner, a very low grade fuel may be used and by
properly setting the valves, the proper supply of gases may
be added to render the fuel thoroughly combustible.?
? GB patent
GB364180 from 1930 (Application Dated April 1, 1931, accepted Jan. 7,
1932) Inventor: Rudolf Erren from Berlin, Germany. "Improvements in and relating
to internal combustion engines using a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen as fuel."
? US patent
2,183,674 - from Dec. 19, 1939 (filed Sep. 10, 1936). Inventor: Rudolf
Erren. "Internal combustion engine using hydrogen as fuel."
? 1980 - Charles T. Weber - U.S. Patent 4,344,831"Apparatus for the Generation of
Gaseous Fuel". In the approved Patent, the inventor says: 
"The present invention
relates to the generation of gaseous fuel for internal combustion engines,
particularly for such engines which use petroleum products to form explosive
mixtures when vaporized in air. It has long been
known that internal
combustion engines can be fueled by a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen as well as
by the standard vaporized petroleum products."
"It is preferable that
both hydrogen and oxygen be provided in gaseous form to an internal combustion
engine in ready-to-burn form."
"The principal object of the present invention
is to provide a method for generating a hydrogen-oxygen fuel
suitable for powering internal combustion engines. Another object of this
invention is to provide apparatus for powering an internal combustion engine
which will reduce
polluting emissions into the atmosphere. Another object of this invention
is to provide a means for powering a vehicle utilizing water
as one of the basic sources of energy." "...apparatus for generating a
gaseous fuel useful as a heat source as well as in an internal combustion engine
which is non-polluting, the materials for which are readily
available in all parts of the world."
? Australian Patent AU-2005100722-A4 -
granted in 2005 by the Australian Patent Office to Robert Michael Roberts and
Chau Kin Nam. Some relate it to the Joe Cell. In part, it looks similar to the
devices shown experimented by Stanley Meyer.
?
U.S. Patent # 6,048,500, from Apr. 11, 2000
?METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR USING HYDROXYL TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS IN THE EXHAUST
GASES FROM THE COMBUSTION OF A FUEL.? In this patent hydrogen is separated from
oxygen, and both are fed into the engine.
?
U.S. Patent # 5,863,413 from Jan. 26, 1999,
describing another ?Hydroxyl Generator? feeding the intake manifold of an
internal combustion engine for similar purposes. In this patent hydrogen is
separated from oxygen, and both are fed into the engine.
? U.S. Patent # 5,452,688 from Sep. 26, 1995, describing
yet another ?Hydroxyl Generator? feeding the carburetor of an internal
combustion engine for similar purposes. Quote from the approved and published
Patent: "This invention relates to the use of electrolytic cells which generate
a gaseous mixture of hydrogen and oxygen to enhance the
efficient burning of hydrocarbon fuels in internal combustion engine
s...Internal combustion engines are known to generate pollutants because
of the incomplete burning of hydrocarbon fuels for power."
? U.S. Patent # 5,231,954 from Aug. 3, 1993 ?HYDROGEN/OXYGEN FUEL CELL.? This Patent displays in Figure1 and Figure2 a very simple Electrolyzer and it states: ?Use of the generated gases as a fuel supplement enables substantial increases in fuel efficiency, while at the same time reducing the emission of pollutants.?
? U.S. Patent # 5,143,025 from Sep. 1,
1992 ?HYDROGEN AND OXYGEN SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING FUEL FOR ENGINES? in which the
inventor says: "The present invention has for its primary object to provide a hydrogen and oxygen gases production system by
electrolysis of water for direct use in an internal combustion engine."
He describes not only his own, but six other U.S. Patents relating the use of
hydrogen and oxygen, generated on board the vehicle from water, to fuel internal
combustion engines and reduce pollution.
? U.S.
Patent # 4,369,737 from Jan. 25, 1983 ?HYDROGEN-OXYGEN GENERATOR.? In
this Patent the inventor, Cledith A. Sanders,
says: ?A cell for generating hydrogen and oxygen comprised of a plastic housing
and a plurality of regularly spaced metallic electrode
rods....This cell finds particular use as a fuel generator for internal
combustion engines.? He also mentions U.S. Patents 3,311,097; 3,980,053; and
4,023,545, and says that ?these patents teach the use of an
electrolytic cell for making combustible mixture of hydrogen and oxygen from
water, and using this mixture of gases as fuel for the engine.?
? U.S. Patent # 6,257,175 B1 from July 10, 2001 ?OXYGEN AND HYDROGEN GENERATOR APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES? that describes in detail the use of hydrogen and oxygen as fuel, and the benefits of reduced pollution, and states that ?It has long been known?. The Patent says: "Hydrogen and oxygen gases are generated for use in an internal combustion engine in a vehicle using the electrical system of the vehicle to provide current for the electrolysis process to generate the hydrogen and oxygen gases. The electrolysis process to eliminate oxygen and hydrogen gases occurs only while the engine is being operated and terminates when the engine stops... It has long been known that the pollution caused by internal combustion engines can be decreased by the addition of oxygen. As a matter of fact, in recent years the oxygenating of fuel has been mandated in various states or areas as a means for decreasing pollution. At the same time, it has long been known that the burning of hydrogen provides a source of clean energy, since the combustion of hydrogen results in the formation of water as a by product. Hence, the use of an electrolysis unit to generate hydrogen and oxygen gases from water provides two important features, one of which is providing additional energy from the internal combustion engine and the other of which is decreasing pollution by the addition of oxygen in the combustion process.
5) Additional data based on http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
and other sources including http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
In
1974 John Houseman and D.J. Cerini of the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, produced
a report for the Society of Automotive Engineers titled "On-Board Hydrogen
Generator for a Partial Hydrogen Injection Internal Combustion Engine"
(available at http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/
and http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/). F.W. Hoehn and
M.W. Dowy, also of the Jet
Propulsion Lab, prepared a report for the 9th Intersociety Energy
Conversion Engineering Conference (held August 26-30, 1974 in San Francisco),
titled "Feasibility Demonstration of a Road Vehicle Fueled with Hydrogen
Enriched Gasoline." This research utilized onboard storage tanks to provide
SUPPLEMENTAL HYDROGEN for combustion
enhancement.
In 1993, researchers Y. Jamal and M.L.Wyszynski of
the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, released a review titled "Onboard
Generation of Hydrogen-Rich Gaseous Fuels - a Review" in which they
concluded: Hydrogen
supplementation of gasoline combustion has been shown to yield reduction in fuel
consumption. Hydrogen-rich gaseous fuels can be burned under ultra lean
conditions to yield very low NOx emissions without
running into lean flammability limit problems. The
lean burning conditions give possibilities for very low CO
emissions.
In 1995, newer investigations have highlighted the
potential for pollutant reduction. Research performed by scientists at the
University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, released a study at the HYPOTHESIS
Conference at the University of Cassino, Italy in which it was presented that
"hydrogen,
when used as a fractional additive at extreme lean engine operation, yields
benefits in improved combustion stability and reduced nitrogen oxides and
hydrocarbon emissions."
In 1997, similar results have been
presented by a team of scientists representing the Department of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University,
China, at an international conference held by the University of Calgary.
Practical tests have been performed by California Environmental Engineering
(CEE), The American Hydrogen Association Test Lab and Corrections Canada in
which reduction in toxic exhaust emissions and fuel consumption were realized.
6) California
Environmental Engineering (CEE): "CEE feels that the
result of this test verifies that this technology is a viable source for
reducing emissions and fuel consumption on large diesel engines." The
American Hydrogen Association Test Lab:"Emissions test results indicate
that a decrease of toxic emissions was
realized."[I don't have the source files, please
email me if you have the
originals].
7) University of Idaho: Recent scientific paper titled "Effect of Hydrogen Enriched Hydrocarbon Combustion on Emissions and Performance", published by Jacob Wall, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho: "The addition of hydrogen has been shown to decrease the formation of NOx, CO and unburned hydrocarbons. Studies have shown that added hydrogen in percentages as low as 5-10% percent of the hydrocarbon fuel can reduce that hydrocarbon fuel consumption. The theory behind this concept is that the addition of hydrogen can extend the lean operation limit, improve the lean burn ability, and decrease burn duration. ---or produce hydrogen from electrolysis of water."
, in essence,
is a worldwide movement of experimenters, TESTING our simple solutions to find
the answer to these questions - for as many vehicles as possible:
- How effective is supplemental hydrohgen for reducing emmissions?
- Is it possible to use small amounts of hydrogen FROM WATER for saving fuel?
- Can it be done for modern cars?
- Can supplemental hydrohgen reduce emissions AND fuel consumption in big-rig 18-wheeler trucks with full load uphill???
My only answer is the testimonials that keep pouring in on my desk.
What we are offering here is experimental know-how that attempts to
reproduce what NASA, the inventors and the scientists mentioned above have
achieved -- namely REDUCTION OF HARMFUL EMISSIONS and FUEL EFFICIENCY --
by:
- Using low cost hardware that you can find TODAY, and
- Exchanging experimental notes with others around the world.
I added the system
described in the manuals, to my Toyota Corolla 1999 (shown to the left).
According to the EPA, it is supposed to get 30 MPG on the highway. In 2007 I
measured over 61 MPG. The measurement was based on a simple road test and not on
scientific methods, but I was very pleased. The trucker in the other photo,
Carter Blankenship III from Fairview, Tennessee (standing in the middle between
Tom Lang and Bill Lang), and also Jerry Young from Sparks, Nevada, reported to
me huge savings on their trucks (over 1 million miles on both of their
engines!!!) - both said they were saving $350 a week, as well as engines feeling
like new and pulling like crazy uphill with heavy loads! Let me give you more
specific numbers from The Nevada 18-wheeler that I have not verified, these are
just verbal testimonials reported to me: from 5.5 MPG
steadily to 6.6 MPG using a 6-pack system, and
with a full load on the trailer maximum speed uphill from 35
MPH to 45 MPH on the same hill. In my primitive calculations, this
translates to 20% better mileage on a loaded 18-wheeler big rig truck, and over
28% increase in engine power. The answer to this question, then, is that you CANNOT drive on water alone. No way. We use water - or more correctly Hydrogen and Oxygen extracted from water - as a supplement to the gasoline (petrol) or diesel fuel.
Skeptics claim that you cannot run your car on water because you cannot get
enough energy from generating hydrogen - the energy you would be putting in
would be greater than the energy from the hydrogen. They have it all wrong!!!
Water-fuel does NOT mean running your car on water, and not even running on
hydrogen made from water! This is a major misunderstanding! When NASA, U.S.
Department of Transportation, U.S. Patent Office and Detroit reported reduction
of harmful emissions and improvements in engine efficiency, they were
specifically saying ADDING A SMALL AMOUNT OF HYDROGEN
TO INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES STILL CONSUMING PETROL
FUEL.
The potential savings do not come from burning hydrogen and
oxygen as fuel, because we have too little of it, per minute. The potential
savings and reduction in emissions can only be attributed to the more complete
combustion of the gasoline or diesel fuel. Read the U.S. Patent and the
documents from NASA and U.S. Department of Transportation to understand this
concept.
In my opinion, and you are welcome to check it out and refund your money
if you open the books and find BS, is that a SIMPLE
technology that you can have right now, allows you to experiment with PRACTICAL
and AFFORDABLE hydrogen-from-water technologies, marked by extraordinary
simplicity and low cost. Attached to my manuals is a list of parts that show
exactly how to manufacture a hydrogen generator for about $15, and a whole
system for about $53.
The list of sources is from 2006 when I have been building experimental kits and
shipping them worldwide myself, in order to collect feedbacks for my research.
(I have given away around 200 systems back then.)
In 2009 I have updated my list of materials and sources, and found better and sometimes cheaper ways of getting the same products and systems. When you order my manuals you will get my complete lists with the latest research and updates. Also added in 2009: a list of sources for low cost parts in the United Kingdom.
Question:
- WHERE IS THE SAVING COMING FROM? AREN'T MODERN CARS SUPPOSED TO BE THE BEST
POSSIBLE TECH?
Answer: - IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, POSSIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS
COMES NOT FROM MAGIC - IT COMES FROM ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY OF POORLY DESIGNED
ENGINES!!! I've read that some engines today use 20% of the energy stored in the
fuel to actually drive - and WASTE 80% to heat, pollution (unburned fuel!)
and vibration. If we could reduce the waste then we could possibly get what
NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit are
talking about, i.e., enhanced efficiency and reduced emissions.
In other
words, seems to me that we are simply tapping into a waste band.
THIS IS
MY PERSONAL NON-SCIENTIFIC VIEW BASED ON EXPLANATIONS THAT I HAVE HEARD FROM
OTHER EXPERIMENTERS. IT IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT OR THEORY BUT AN EFFORT TO
MAKE SENSE OF THE CHANGES I HAVE SEEN IN MY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSIONS.
- is NOT my
invention and is not new either. Based on old "forgotten" US Patents, Bill and
Tom Lang of Gulf Laboratories, USA (http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/) has developed
technology that uses a little electricity out of your car/truck battery, to
separate water into a gas called "HHO" (2 parts Hydrogen + 1 Oxygen).
HHO, also called Brown's Gas, Water-Fuel or Hydroxy, has been shown to burn
(don't try this at home - it is VERY combustible!!!) - while the end product
of its burning is... water! By the way, pound for pound HHO GAS IS CLAIMED TO BE 3 TIMES MORE POTENT THAN GASOLINE
and is therefore a fast growing trend between experimenters of
performance boost and MPG.
- Since Bill and Tom Lang wanted their development to be "Open Source" (open to the public for royalty-free experimentation, development and even sell-your-own), I added some improvements of my own and documented the technology in great detail so you can follow their footsteps. The resulting research is what you will find in my manuals.
- You will discover how simple and affordable these devices are.
- Also easy to install and maintain if you are technical. If you don't like working on cars, it is absolutely OK with me that you make a free copy of my manuals for your mechanic or technical friend, and have them install it for you.
- You get permission to replicate our devices - for POTENTIAL personal savings or business profit!
- Useful for carb or fuel injection, gasoline (petrol), as well as
diesel
and turbo-diesel.
- Experimenters having old/new cars, motorhomes and now even big rig trucks
reported
to benefit from .
Everybody's talking about the power of Hydrogen. I believe that Hydrogen vehicles with their pressurized hydrogen, and hydrogen gas stations - are DANGEROUS!!!
It gets worse: hydrogen factories pollute the environment
and spoil the ecological advantage of hydrogen "clean" cars. At the factory
level, not in the street, but it is not good for the planet.
The solution
provides you with "Hydrogen-On-Demand" - you produce Hydrogen
when you need it. No storage tanks, no trucks
to haul hydrogen in the streets.
I think is far
better for the environment; as far as my driving experience since 2006, it was
perfectly safe for me and my passengers. I speak from personal experience and
the experience of many satisfied customers, while this is, you understand, still
experimental. I want to be so
well known that eventually the auto manufacturers will adopt it in their new
designs and then it will not be experimental anymore, but well tested and well
engineered, vehicle by vehicle. When that happens, you will not need my manuals
anymore. So your choice today is: "Do I want to know about it TODAY, or wait who
knows how many years for the automakers to pick it up?"
| Price of US
Addiction to Foreign Oil: ### |
I don't expect you to believe in water-enhanced vehicles. I was skeptic too -
until I actually saw advantages to my own car. We
open the door for you and welcome you to experiment with us. You may join the
experimenters who have had success, or you will at least get the education
regarding supplemental hydrogen.
If you experiment and are having a hard
time getting the results you are expecting, we offer free tech support via
email. It's a learning process for all of us.
When I was a child, my father was always telling me how impossible it was to
get energy out of nothing. He was right - it's impossible to get it out of
nothing - but the scientists "forgot" to tell him that water is not
"nothing" - WATER IS A VERY POWERFUL FUEL. All you
need is the right "match" to ignite it and...BANG!
Wait a minute!
If you're thinking, "If water, when converted to gas, is explosive, isn't it
dangerous?"
NO,
IT IS NOT DANGEROUS, due to
several factors that you will see in a minute. I've been driving with it daily
for 3 years and I know 1000's of other drivers using technology
in very hot to very cold climates - as far as I have seen it is as safe as any
other technology in the car, the hydrogen is ignited ONLY by the spark of your
engine, when it is actually inside the engine. Additionally, there are only
small quantities of hydrogen being generated as you drive and Hydrogen is not
stored in a storage tank. That's why some call it "Hydrogen On
Demand."
Here's what I personally think about Hydrogen Tanks versus
Hydrogen-From-Water:
WHY
COMPRESS HYDROGEN IN (WHAT SEEMS TO ME) DANGEROUS HIGH-PRESSURE TANKS WHEN IT IS
ALREADY "COMPRESSED" IN PLAIN WATER - AND CAN BE EASILY AND SAFELY
RELEASED??!
According to testimonials
we have received from experimenters in the USA and Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, Europe and now in Asia and Africa, and according to the documents
you've seen above by NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office
and Detroit, supplemental Hydrogen technology may produce the following results
for your vehicle, gasoline or diesel (these are my own
interpretations):
- Possibly improve your mileage with .
- Reduces harmful emissions. Your health and the health of your family depends on clean air. When burned, the "Brown's Gas" we produce turns right back into water! Since Hydrogen helps the engine to BURN FUEL MORE COMPLETELY, the overall effect is dramatic reduction in harmful emissions. In my cars and cars/trucks of other experimenters with Supplemental Hydrogen, I was able to smell the difference right away.
- NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit say that Supplemental Hydrogen enhances engine power and performance. In my understanding, this is why the big-rig trucks have been reported to pull much better uphill.
- Supplemental Hydrogen may also remove carbon deposits and prevent future carbon build up. This is (again, in my humble understanding) why many drivers report a smoother operation. In many vehicles small and large, the engine becomes so quiet that you don't hear it. On the highway I cannot any noise from my turbo-diesel, and Jeff C. of Mission Viejo, CA, told me the same thing happened with his turbo-diesel motorhome (Mercedes Benz 316 Sprinter).
- NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit say that Supplemental Hydrogen reduces internal engine temperature - so it may protect your environment (global warming) and your engine.
- If you get similar results like mine you will notice a calmer, quieter and smoother engine and
gearshifts. This is due to the effect has on the
combustion cycle inside your engine.
- It is my understanding and expectation that promotes a
longer life expectancy of the engine - especially pistons, valves, rings and
bearings. This was evident in two gasoline cars in my household where the
engine oil stayed so clean that we didn't have to replace it so often.
- Pride and satisfaction with : I enjoy
being an advisor on fuel economy experimentation, even though I am in no way
replacing the scientists and engineers from NASA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit. So do Bill and Tom Lang, the
original developers, and now Tennessee's trucker Carter Blankenship III and
Nevada's trucker Jerry Young who are becoming models for other truckers. You
too may feel pride and satisfaction by sharing your newly acquired knowledge
with your friends, family, neighbors, community, church members and
co-workers. So many drivers, truck owners and fleet owners are struggling, but
they need to know about this, for the mere chance of better fuel economy,
cleaner engines and cleaner air!
| # |
| World CO2 since 1750 (cubic feet) |
- We must turn this clock backwards! Let's try and eliminate as much harmful exhaust emission that pollute the environment and contribute to global warming.
- Judging by the reports from NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit, there is a chance we may reduce petroleum demand and our economical dependability. Water is available everywhere and we need very little of it for a family car or company truck.
- If we get more results on many more cars and large trucks, as well as generators, farm equipment and other internal combustion engines such as trains and boats, it might help us to prevent global warming. Large generators such as those used by large generators, trains and boats, require more Hydrogen and Oxygen, but the same principles apply to any size engine.
- Hydrogen is a clean-burning fuel that adds water and oxygen into the
atmosphere instead of polluting it. In my opinion is great
for the environment, regardless of mileage or no mileage.
Charged Water System - Mileage gain 48.5%
My friend Don C. tried out the charged water system in his 1993 Pontiac
Grand AM. Went from 28 MPG to 41.6 MPG.
Bill Lang (Florida, USA)
"Really amazing I got 37% better mileage"
My first mileage results were really amazing I got 37% better mileage, in my
1985 Toyota P.U. truck it has a 22re fuel injected motor with 328000 miles Yes I
have been driving this forever .
My mileage in the sommer is around 26
to 29 mpg , in the winter its around 23 to 24 mpg depending on how cold it is ,
the average is 25 mpg , with the water4gas unit installed I got 34 mpg amazing ,
this was not highway driving backroads with hills stop and go and warm up in the
morning when it cold !
Also I noticed better power up hills in fifth
gear.
Take Good Care Ozzie
P.M. (Connecticut, USA)
PS I
am sure to tell a lot of my friends about your unit !
"Almost no sign or smell of any kind of polution"
You may recall a previous discussion on how children are being poisoned
around the port of LA and on the West Side of Buffalo, around the Peace Bridge.
Well how's is this for PROOF OF CONCEPT! I was connecting up a charged water
system in BUFFALO, in the 2 1/2 car garage. It was really cold, so I
started up the vehicle and ran it in the garage, with the door closed, for about
two minutes, to check the engine vacuum. WELL, 3 minutes and I was about ready
to choke from the fumes. Five minutes later, with the unit installed, I
start the car up and the owner and I are standing around in the garage
discussing how good it runs etc. etc....five minutes later we are still talking
and there is almost no sign or smell of any kind of polution.
Bill Lang,
Jan.08 from Buffalo, New York (USA)
"Within minutes I could smell a BIG difference in the exhaust emission"
Hello Ozzie,
I have completed the installation today. After I completed
the installation and ran the car, within minutes I could smell a BIG difference
in the exhaust emission, it quietened the engine and it ran so sweetly and that
was within minutes!!!!
I will be starting tests tomorrow and can't wait
to prove what I already know.
Ozzie, this is going to be big!!!!! I will
be inviting people to a demonstration shortly and will very guardedly talk to
our local media because petrol prices are really hurting people here and of
course the greenhouse gas issue. I want people to know about this and want to
help them save on fuel etc.
Everything I have read on your website and
related links appears to be so completely true which has built my faith in this
development and as I have followed things out that turned out to be chasing
shadows it has made me so enthusiastic about this product I am nearly bursting
out of my skin.
I will stay in touch. For the record my car is a 1986
Nissan Skyline 6 cylinder 3litre fuel injected. It has only done 98,000 Klms or
nearly 60,000 miles so is in very good condition.
Believe me, I would
not know what I now know had I not bought my membership. Thank you for that.
Regards,
N.S. (Queensland, Australia)
Passed smog with no catalytic inverter (this is an older story from Bill Lang)
A friend of mine installed one on an old Cadillac. His catalytic converter
had gone bad so he removed it and took it in for emissions testing. After the
test the mechanic came out and said "Boy you sure have a great catalytic
converter on that car!"
B.L. (Florida, USA)
"My car continues to improve... Feels like a new car!!"
My car is an 1986
Subaru GL. I bought her originally in 1989.
Two weeks ago I agreed to
have the gas saving device put on my car. Immediately I noticed that the engine
was much, much quieter and smoother.
We did a test drive on the car with
and without the device. The results were spectacular. The Subaru does 32.8 miles
to the gallon. With the device - which is only the very basic fitting - the
Subaru did 36.8 miles to the gallon, a saving of twelve and a half percent. With
the rest of the equipment that Ozzie has now I estimate I would save circa
40%.
What was really noticeable on this test drive was the difference in
the quietness of the engine and how the car picked up much more easy with the
device installed.
Since then, I have noticed that the car continues to
improve and I feel she is back to where she was in 1989. Feels like a new car!!
I am very pleased to have this device on my car which will not only save
on the gas, but clean the engine, reduce emissions into the environment, and
therefore give my car a longer life, as I love my Subi.. Also this will help
because this year I have to have a complete smog test to go with my application
for my registration renewal.
J.H. (California, USA)
"I have been seeing up to 45 % better gas mileage"
Thank's...I got everything and made a hydrogen generator to your
spec's...Works good on smaller motors ...I put it on a honda civic...does about
15 % better on gas ..not bad..no tweeks...no 02 just the generator.
the
past few days I have made 6 more models suitable for 1.2L - 3.0L on up to 5.2L
to 7.0L gas and diesel engines now working on 8+.....I have been seeing up to 45
% better gas milage with a few tweeks.
K.B. (Kentucky, USA)
"Everybody should have this technology!" (this is my story from 2006 before
I started )
A friend
installed this gizmo in my truck two months ago. After 30 seconds first start I
noticed that the engine becume soooo quiet. At first I thought the RPM went down
because of the water, but no, the device has definitely changed the way my
engine works - it does not ping anymore!
Another thing I noticed right
away was that the absolutely terrible stink previously coming out of my exhaust
has gone down dramatically. Man it was choking me -I can breath again!
Drove it home, engine roars +feels like much bigger engine! After 5-6
miles I kinda went into a "smooth bubble", like the engine suddenly becume
smooth as butter. Was a very hot day so I figured it might be the weather. I was
wrong!! The car continued to run smooth in ANY weather, and kept improving all
the time day after day, week after week.
It's now so quiet that FOR THE
FIRST TIME now I can listen to the radio at low volume or talk on the cellphone
without shouting!
On road tests I got "only" +13% improvement on MPG,
but the company gave me a solution to improve that to at least 25% with small
modification.
When the truck broke down I automatically blamed the new
gizmo. Wrong again! It was a leaking radiator which I fixed for $1.99 using
Aluma-Seal. Now I know THE GIZMO ONLY IMPROVES MY CAR all this time. And with so
much less engine vibration and no valve/piston knocking, I expect the life of my
engine to double!
What I DONT LIKE now is when I open the truck window
and all these OTHER cars are so noisy and stinking!!! Everybody should have this
technology! I'm tired of this...well its like second hand smoking... you can
call it second hand smogging LOL
E.S. (California, USA)
38% better mileage - Dodge B150 1999 Cargo Van
I thought I would take the time to let you and Water4Gas know how my
experience has been since I purchased your two Ebooks two months ago.
I
chose to read the Gas Savings Technique book first because this was the fastest
way for me to start saving gas RIGHT NOW. After reading your book I started
implementing the driving techniques and the additive formula's.
I live in
Montana and do a lot of highway driving and in city driving. My driving habits
before reading your Ebooks were "Fast and Furious" to say the least. I am a self
employed contractor and I make my living driving to and from the small towns in
Montana. I drive a 1999 Dodge B150 cargo van, 318cu engine with throttle body
fuel injection and air conditioning. I have a 35 gallon gas tank and I burn
regular unleaded. Engine has 199,400 miles on it so far. My tires are about 7
months old. I removed all the ladders from the top of my van to reduce air drag
and I carry about 1,000 lbs of parts and equipment including my body weight of
202 lbs.
My average highway speed before reading your E books was between
70 and 80 miles per hour. My average in town speed was never the speed limit
with fast take offs at the green light. After a long trip on the highway my trip
meter would average between 350miles and 375 miles per tank.
After using
the GST's my gas mileage is almost 500 miles per tank !!. I am using the
Acetone/Xylene and GP-7 (AXG7-TS), formula every other tank, check my tire psi
at least once per month, tuned up my engine, and lowered my highway speed to
between 60 and 65mph and drive slow in town. This whole experience has helped me
"slow down" in life and my stress has been reduced in my job. When ever I feel
in a hurry I think of the gas I will be wasting just to arrive at a location "
15 minutes a head of time".
I think anyone just staring out with your
Ebooks should read the GST's first. This will open their eyes about the whole
concept of gas savings and will build their confidence and motivation when they
are ready to build and install the HHO electrolyzer.
I just finished a
two cell electrolyzer arrangement for my van. I would have went with six cells
but there's justs no room in my engine compartment. Two cells are better than
one cell.
I have not had time to install my electrolyzer's yet but when I
do I will be alot more prepared for it's results.
Thanks for your Ebooks.
It was well worth it.
M. Porter (Montana, USA) 3/20/08
Higher Performance - Jaguar XJ6
Ever since you
installed the Water4Gas device, my engine has been running much more smoothly
and efficiently. I drive a Jag XJ6 and my average miles per gallon has been
16-18 miles.
Now that the device is installed I am experiencing 19-24
miles per gallon fuller at least. This is a substantial fuel savings for me.
In addition I have more "pep" on my accelarations. It feels like I have
a totally different car with more power and smoothness.
Thanks for your
product. I am totally impressed and satisfied.
A.C. (California,
USA)
25% More Mileage - 2005 Nissan Sentra
MY Water4Gas unit I have on my car is working. So far I have noticed a jump
in mpg from 24ish mpg to 30ish mpg I am running it on a 2005 Nissan Sentra. I
also wrapped several layers of tinfoil around my Oxygen sensor, doing this will
trick your O sensor into thinking it is to hot which will affect how much
gas/oxygen mixture your injectors or carburetor will take.
J.R. (Oregon,
USA)
"I feel like I hit the lottery"
Thank you Ozzie, for putting together such an awesome book! I'm consistantly
getting 27-30 MPG highway now. (varies from hilly terrain in PA) I feel like I
hit the lottery!
Mike W. (MA, USA)
"I'm sold!"
Hello Ozzie,
I only 'found-out' about hydrogen technology within the last
MONTH..!
<> I mean, that there are kits & plans available for the
average guy to do it NOW..!
Your Water4 Gas.com is a mesmerizing website
= = I'm sold!
So it seems too good an opportunity to pass up.
I will be
back tomorrow to purchase your two e-books.
R.A. Foreman (USA)
"This site blows them all away"
"I purchased all the components for the HHO system....This is a wonderful
thing to finally see happen. I knew there were others out there trying to create
GREEN energy and sell it, but this site blows them all away. Many thank you's
for the posting of such a great collection of information. Hopefully I can add
to it in the near future. To a GREENER TOMORROW!!!!"
Eric from Wisconsin
(USA)
Some admiration...
I have the greatest respect for Ozzie - and consider him a friend.
I have also found him to be a man of character. Trustworthy. His
credentials, degrees and experience - are all greater than mine. ...I LOVE the
guy for sharing this with us! Giving US a chance to get
out of the ditch! = and Being Able therefore, to help
others!
R.A. Foreman (USA)
"The best"
"This is byfar the best Water Power device I have seen!"
Maxwell
30-vehicle UK Success says: "proves your system actually works!"
Hi Ozzy,
That is a great testimonial from Carter, would it be OK if
we published this breakthrough on our UK website tranztecuk. We have still got
so many sceptics and scientists telling me this formula does not work, but hey,
who cares, because all the 25 vehicles + 5 of our own that the water4gas has
been fitted on proves your system actually works!. We will get there, as more
and more people are seeing our vehicles and talking about it. Thank
you.
Regards
Neil Prendergast, UK, TranzTecUK.com
ALL THE TESTIMONIALS BELOW COPIED WITH PERMISSION FROM http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/ and http://aseafood.magniwork.hop.clickbank.net/-- the following success stories are for commercial kits, developed by Niel and Sam Prendergast from my manuals and their own experience with race cars and previous water fuel experimentationTranzTecUK of Bolton, Lancashire, UK (near Manchester), has
installed and/or sold wholesale and retail 1000's of kits. The following
testimonials have been sent by Neil's customers from around the world.
Niel and Sam's contact -- Email neil@tranztecuk.com or sam@tranztecuk.com;
Phone (+44) 0-1204-594531 (Mon.-Fri. 9:30am-5pm), Weekends 10am-5pm GMT;
Uk Mobile 07723-349168 9.30am-10pm GMT, 7 days/week. Toyota Hilux surf 30% !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
||
It's very simple. The do-it-yourself kit consists of a small container,
made of glass, metal or plastic, which is usually installed under the hood. You
fill it with DISTILLED WATER and low-cost household catalyst (that causes the
electrical current). The device gets 12 Volts from the engine, and produces HHO
gas (Hydrogen+Oxygen).
The HHO gas is then supplied to the engine's air intake or carburetor as shown in the diagram below. Our design is simple. Don't worry, you will get full instructions and diagrams that make it simple and clear. Installation time depends on your skills, but I estimate that it will take you 15-20 minutes to make the physical connections shown below:
The electrical connection is quite simple - but must be done right. The
device connects to the 12 Volts of your battery via the ignition switch, to
prevent hydrogen production when the engine is off. A low-cost relay (I get them
for less than $3 from All Electronics) may be added and the manuals show how.
Each device is fuse-protected and draws very little current, normally only 2-3
Amps. This may take 10-15 minutes to connect depending on your skills. If you
have difficulty in this area you can (a) get help from a mechanic, or (b) get
help from auto stereo installers, who are very familiar with vehicle electrical
wiring.
In my humble opinion, diesel installation is much
simpler! Even if you have a turbo - we've had feedback of great success
that showed us how simple it is to deal with turbo diesels in both cars and
trucks. Lately I installed a system in my
own VW TDI (Turbo-Diesel Injection) with great
success: I feel much more power, getting higher mileage readings - and the
installation was indeed easier.
Below you will see success
stories with diesels - they both did a very simple installation as shown above.
The only difference was that the Italian guy used one device (on a small 1.9
liter diesel called Bora), and the American guy used six devices on his large
12.7 liter Detroit diesel engine. Note that these user
reports are authentic stories from Water4Gas experimenters, however we have not
verified them, and we CANNOT guarantee in any way, shape or form the accuracy or
repeatability of these results - even if your diesel vehicle is one of the exact
same models reported below.
"For my VW
Bora 1.9 TDI I've gone from 25.9 liters per 296 km to 15.5 liters per 313
km." |
 |
|
 |
77% better mileage - Volkswagen
Bora 1.9 Liter TDI (Turbo Diesel) 
26% better mileage - BIG RIG DIESEL TRUCK - First of all, does NOT
modify your vehicle's engine or computer. It is an experimental add-on that can be removed in minutes.
- Your car or truck is being damaged right
now by unburned fuel!
Adding hydrogen to the air intake of internal combustion engines have been reported to minimize carbon deposits caused by unburned gasoline. Over the first few days of using my system
back in 2006, I notice that the engine became smoother and smoother the more I
drove. Then, it leveled off at a new (smoother and quieter) level. Whenever I
disconnect my hydrogen-from-water system for a couple of days, the engine
quickly becomes rough once more.
- I witnessed that device
makes the engine quiet and calm. The engine stops knocking ("pinging"). My simple, non-scientific explanation: the
water and hydrogen change the combustion cycle into a more even or "round"
cycle - and if you need to know more you can read NASA's scientific
explanations on how hydrogen changes the combustion cycle. This happens
immediately or soon after installation, and from that moment on, the engine
works in a new way. The effect is not only less noise, it's also less
vibration, resulting in reduced strain on the transmission (thus smoother gear
shifts), cleaner pistons and valves (my mechanic looked at the spark plugs and
was surprised how clean they were), and generally better engine operation.
- Water has been reported to cool down internal combustion engines. For
years, heavy trucks and ships have been using costly water injection systems
to cool down their engines. These truck/ship owners are very sensitive to
maintenance expenses and they know from years of experience that water
reduces their breakdowns and overall operating costs. With we try to
do the same thing affordably! Wouldn't you rather
pay as little as $100-$200 to get a cooler and calmer engine in your car or
truck?
- In my cars, system
allowed me to accelerate faster. Sometimes I notice that after acceleration,
I don't have to press the gas pedal as much to keep going. Carter Blankenship
III from Tennessee and Jerry Young from Nevada reported that their 18-wheeler
big rig trucks pull MUCH better uphill with 6-packs (6
hydrogen generators on each truck, and they both used the small 1-quart jars).
Would you agree that less strain on the Detroit Turbo Diesel engine should
result in less wear and tear over the life of the engine? That's my assumption
anyway, and they were happy with their 6-packs.
Every vehicle is
different, so we cannot promise exact numbers, in fact we cannot promise ANY
numbers, but here's what I have gotten so far from my experimenters:
On November 7, 2006, this man, Tom Lang of South Pasadena, CA, reported 41% higher MPG using the small device (shown) in his heavy GMC Vandura van. I examined his MPG measuring method that same day, and found it very accurate in my humble opinion (he drained all the fuel, then poured one exact gallon and measured how far he could go). In December 2006 he reported nearly 50% MPG gain after a minor tuning of the carburetor (one turn down on the gas screw, one turn up on the air screw). His brother Bill Lang of Clearwater, Florida, reported MPG improvement on the average of 35% in twelve test cars.
Peter M. from Connecticut reported a 37% mileage
improvement the very first day of using our system on his Toyota truck.
Glenn A. from Pennsylvania reported 70% better
mileage and the list goes on and on - see testimonials.
During 2008 we've been getting astounding feedbacks from experimenters -
reported results of up to 430% MPG gain (Robert "Walking Eagle" from
Bakersfield, California). While 430% (over four times the
original mileage) is absolutely not an average, the more we know and the
more we educate our existing readers with our new knowledge, the greater the
average gain of
experimenters becomes. By now, many have reported doubling their gas mileage
with and many
others gained 50% or so. Once more, these user reports are
authentic stories from Water4Gas experimenters, however we have not verified
them, and we CANNOT guarantee in any way, shape or form the accuracy or
repeatability of these results.
My personal story:
I started experimenting in 2006. My 3%-10% mileage gain was
annoying and embarrassing, while some of my readers were reporting much better
results. 
In March 2007 a
simple change I've discovered online BOOSTED MY MILEAGE UP TO 56% - I WAS
HAPPY!!! That was with a 20-year-old Ford Bronco-2.
In 2007 I switched to a
newer Toyota, to see what the same technology would do on modern cars. In July
2007 I made more breakthroughs in my research and my MPG gain went up to 77%
UPHILL, AVERAGING 59%. THE METHODS I USED WERE INACCURATE, NON-SCIENTIFIC
ROAD TESTS, but I felt I was getting somewhere. In september 2007 I measured
61 MPG in the Toyota, which was almost
twice the EPA estimate at the time (32 highway miles per galon). In 2008 I
bought a VW Jetta TDI which is a Turbo Diesel car, to see what Water4Gas might
do to diesels and turbo-diesels. The installation was simple and my car stopped
feeling sluggish, now it felt more like a "racing diesel" and is fun to ride.
Mileage measured in a road test in November 2008 using a scanner (not an
accurate test) was around 60 MPG, and I want to get higher MPG by applying more
of the techniques described in my Water4Gas manuals (mainly I plan on using the
Fuel Heater and the xylene-based fuel additives, but also air filter and oil
filter extra enhancements).
-Ozzie Freedom, Water4Gas.com
HOW MUCH HARD-EARNED-MONEY ARE YOU THROWING AWAY?
The calculations below are
a math game only and should never be taken as typical results or as a promise of
any kind. THESE ARE ASSUMPTIONS THAT MUST BE EXPERIMNENTED VEHICLE BY VEHICLE.
Let's say you drive a vehicle that gets 20 miles per gallon and you cover
2,000 miles per month, then you're consuming 100 gallons of gasoline a month. At
$4 per gallon this equals to $4,800 yearly out of your pocket! I KNOW IN EUROPE
YOU'RE PAYING TWICE OR MORE FOR PETROL... Save 35% fuel and you will have saved
$1,680 per year in gasoline (petrol). If you are three or four drivers in the
family or small company, these yearly savings increases dramatically - you get to keep $5,040 each and every year!
The
U.S. Department of Transportation reports that the average life span of a
vehicle is 12 years. This gives us the potential saving for EACH VEHICLE (over
its life span) as high as $20,160.
And what if you have a fleet of 50
drivers in your company? Assuming only 2000 miles a month, savings will multiply
to $1,008,000 (a million dollars) over the life span of the fleet's vehicles.
What can you do with extra million?
If you are the fleet manager
responsible for the economics of many trucks or transportation vans, then you
know exactly what I'm talking about.
LET'S COMPARE YOUR OPTIONS
My math is based on my own tests but may vary for you depending on car or truck model, weather, driving conditions, altitude, etc. And with gas prices changing like crazy, I can never be accurate. In fact my calculations may be off by 25% or more. Yet the GREAT differences in the bottom line you see below will give you a clear idea of which solution you want to have - and how much you are risking:
|
Product: |
Do-It-Yourself HHO System | High-End ready made HHO system | Hybrid Car |
| Your investment | $150-$200 | $1,200 + $400 installation | $17,000 |
| Power Boost | 15-20% | 15-20% | 0 |
| Reduce emissions | Yes | Yes | Not on highway! |
| Noise Reduction | Excellent | Excellent | Not on highway! |
| Make money on referrals? | YES! | No | No |
| Permission to replicate? | YES! | No! | No way! |
| Monthly Operation* | 30?/mo | 30?/mo | expensive batteries every 5 years |
| You Save Monthly** | $140 | $140 | $29.90 |
| You Save Yearly** | $1,680 | $1,680 | $359 |
| Time to cover investment | 12.6 months | 47 Years | |
| Time to cover
investment for a large truck |
Depends on
model |
--- | |
| Guaranteed mileage? | NO - you are an experimenter | Most developers would not guarantee mileage | Average mileage measured by the government |
| Notes: * Estimated yearly consumption of 4 Gallons of distilled water +1 box of catalyst. BUT with do-it-yourself technology parts and maintenance cost much less (you will get full instructions and full access to our low-cost suppliers). ** Estimated gas savings based on a 20-MPG car driving 2000 miles using $4 fuel. | |||
| REMEBER AND UNDERSTAND, PLEASE, THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO GURANTEE THAT YOU WILL GET THESE RESULTS. THIS IS MY OWN MATH GAME BASED ON MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCES AND MY OWN PERSONAL OPINIONS. | |||
|
Correction, May 2009: I used to
compare
technology against in such a way that puts down the "competition". I
apologize for anybody in the industry who might have been offended. See,
there is no "competition" here since you may be a backyard mechanic who
wants a do-it-yourself system, or you may be a the regular consumer who
wants to buy a ready-made system. You're right both ways and there's no
conflict. We're not trying to convert you from one preference to another.
Therefore, whichever you choose is right, I'm just showing you my own
calculations to help you decide. | |||
Is
It Legal to Install a Hydrogen-From-Water System?
I am not a lawyer. You watch
and decide for yourself:
Why We Do Not Keep Secrets from You
|
|
Great scientists
and inventors such as Nikola Tesla have failed to fully realize their
dream of HELPING OTHERS, and great inventions were lost, possibly forever.
Why? The problem was always 
|
Ozzie distributed several free systems back in 2006, but the
publication of the instruction manuals is what really started the |
You will discover step-by-step instructions to EASILY and AFFORDABLY
make the hydrogen-from-water system shown below for as low as $53, using simple tools at
home.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
ATTENTION:
BY CLICKING THE ORDER BUTTON BELOW YOU ARE not ORDERING THIS SYSTEM!!!
YOU ARE
ORDERING A DO-IT-YOURSELF GUIDE ON HOW TO MAKE THIS SYSTEM plus INFORMATION ON HOW TO MANUFACTURE IT WITH GOOD PROFIT
POTENTIAL.
TO ORDER READY-TO-INSTALL SYSTEMS VISIT OUR ONLINE CATALOG after YOU HAVE READ THESE
MANUALS.
 |
|
 |
|
Book 1:
|
Book 2:
|
By ordering these
products you agree to the Terms
NOTE: NO PRINTOUTS AVAILABLE. These are online manuals
and you can print them from your computer.
You Will Discover How To Transform ONE Set of Hardware into FIVE Types of Hydrogen Systems:
- HHO/BROWN'S GAS GENERATOR (people call it
"Hydrogen Generator" but as I said HHO is more powerful than pure Hydrogen
because the oxygen helps too), consisting of the Electrolyzer, wiring harness,
hoses and installation accessories. Works with Pure Baking Soda in DISTILLED WATER. Most of the success stories
published here are based on this system.
- WATER VAPOR BOOSTING SYSTEM, consisting of the
Vaporizer, hoses and installation accessories. Works with TAP WATER. Not as powerful as system #1 but
may still boost power and mileage in some vehicles. Not a sure winner, but
since it's very simple, and easy to replicate in a few minutes, I believe it's
worth trying.
- CHARGED WATER SYSTEM, a unique invention
making use of BOTH JARS with distilled water, Pure Baking Soda as well as
tap water and hydrogen peroxide (cheap non-hazardous
liquid from your drugstore or dollar store). Instructions will be given to
you, and you may find this system very interesting. You will need to add a
small aquarium pump and a small charger. This is a gas-saving system that has
only a FEW success stories, the Lang brothers included (Saturn 94 with a
throttle-body injection).
- ADVANCED HHO BOOSTING SYSTEM. This system is
the best of the best and consists of
the Electrolyzer (with the wiring harness, hoses and installation
accessories), enhanced by the PCV Enhancer,
Fuel Heater and above all MAP Sensor
Enhancer or Electronic Fuel Injection
Enhancer. Works with Pure Baking
Soda in distilled water. Worked
in newer cars (1996 and newer). This is the system with which I measured 61
MPG on the Toyota.
- HEALTHY DRINKING WATER MAKER, a
unique use of BOTH JARS with distilled water, Pure Baking Soda as well as
filtered water (no hydrogen peroxide
this time). Here too you will need a small aquarium pump and a charger. UNIQUE
system that you cannot find anywhere else and rivals commercial drinking
water chargers, that you can make for
$20-$50.
What is a "Water Car" anyhow? To tell you the truth, after 3 years in this
business I'm not sure. Rumors say that there are water cars running on water
only. I've seen movies of a Japanese company claiming to have a water car. Anyway, I
haven't seen any that I can touch and test-drive, and just for clarification I
do not call vehicles
"water cars" but something like "water assisted vehicle", or "hydrogen assisted
vehicle", or "water hybrid," or something like that. When you say "water car"
people's imagination starts to run wild.
Anyway, blueprints exist for famous designs claimed to be "water cars" or
at least something in that direction. I've seen "water-car plans" sold on eBay
and other
websites for $20 up to $189 each. Don't pay $100's for these "watercar" plans because you will receive this rare compilation of TWELVE plans for famous "water cars".
These documents are not an advertisement to buy stuff. The information is
ALL THERE, from text and graphs to mechanical diagrams and electronic
schematics. You will find that these plans are actually a package of very rare
data and instructions, jam-packed with rare information (nearly 300 documents).
Here's a sneak peek into WATERCAR PLAN #10
I do not have the funds to
prove the validity of these plans. I have NOT written them either. Yet I
feel that it is important to
keep these ideas alive. Again, the term "water car" is very vague and
even though some people claim they have seen cars running on water alone, I
haven't seen one myself. This "water car" collection is provided to you for
entertainment purposes only - don't go ahead and build a business philosophy
around it because it is nothing but free but hard-to-find information from the
Internet - beautifully organized and given to you free with your order - but
that's about it.
You will receive immediate access to "water-car" designs by the following
inventors:
- Stan Meyer (Stanley Meyer)
- HydroStar (or "Hydro-Star", and its newer version "HydroGen" or "Hydro-Gen") - you will get both versions! Do not pay $49 elsewhere just to get the fuzzy older version!!! I won't mention names, but if you've purchased these plans elsewhere then you've been ripped off - take your money back and get both Hydro-Star and Hydro-Gen here free with your order!
- "Joe" (Joe Cell) the mysterious inventor from Australia, as documented by Alex Schiffer and others
- The famous GEET by Paul Pantone, reported to me as good for stationary fixed-RPM engines
- Rudolph W. Gunnerman
- Carl Cella
- Juan Carlos Aguero
- Archie Blue
- "Smack" Booster
- The Australian "Nitro Cell" or "D18" by an unknown inventor
- The famous Camaro design by an auto mechanic who identified himself only as "S1R9A9M9"
- "Watercar" plans published by Drunvalo Melchizedek from Spirit Of Ma'at.
(Available as online downloads only, no printout will be shipped). My manuals are
copyrighted and you may NOT sell them as e-books or as printouts, however you
MAY download any of these "water cars" blueprints listed above that you will get
with your order, compile a set and sell it anywhere you wish, even as printouts.
I'd say a good compilation of these hard-to-find blueprints should cost at least
$50-$60 online, and much more in print.
Simply click on the big red button "Click Here For Instant Access" (below)
and follow the easy instructions. As soon as you've placed your
order, you'll get INSTANT ACCESS to all your online manuals +bonuses
+parts lists for mass production or small scale production +the system vendors
list! You can pay with credit/debit card or PayPal. Your purchase is protected
by a 100% satisfaction cashback, guaranteed by ClickBank.
These are not printed books but online manuals
that are delivered ONLINE - if your computer can handle THIS website, then you
can read or print these manuals using your browser. No download time, access is
immediate, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
YES! Give me the online manuals now for only $97, one-time charge.I understand that this a limited time offer and may be removed any time. | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Time is running out! We want you to have this rare information TODAY,
so we're giving away all this free stuff. But these unique bonuses and the
special low-low price, especially for this type of in-depth information AND TECH
SUPPORT, are not promised forever. Don't wait! TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS LIMITED
TIME OPPORTUNITY TO GAIN SO MUCH WITH PRACTICALLY NOTHING TO LOSE. Order your
online manuals now!
|
By ordering the
manuals you agree to the TermsThese are ONLINE MANUALS and no printout will be shipped to you. | |||
 Why is it safe to shop here? Who is ClickBank? |
 |
||